The AI-native Validation Platform for Mobile Apps.
Independent validation at every step from idea to release — whether it's hand-written or AI-generated.
(Au)tomated (Cert)ification.
Confidential & proprietary — prepared for the named recipient. Not for distribution or reproduction.
The team that's lived this problem.
Vivek Soneja
- Improved WhatsApp's Android app for billions of users, at Meta
- Founding architect at PhonePe — first commit to 500M+ users; now a ~$15B company
- Built Flipkart's apps from scratch on the original app team — India's largest e-commerce platform
- Owned the mobile QA pipelines Aucert now automates — and watched AI codegen break them
Rajesh Kumar
- A decade in PayPal's core payments infrastructure — reliability at financial scale
- Building Multiplier's 0→1 global payroll engine across 80+ countries
- Built under finance-grade compliance regimes — the policy layer Aucert now encodes
- Leading the shift to AI-driven quality — knows why AI alone isn't enough
"Which is why we know exactly what's about to break →"
QA has always been the bottleneck.
Complex, manual, brittle — every release drags through a device matrix, store-policy checks, and a regression suite that snaps on every change.
Illustrative single-feature cycle for a typical mid-market mobile team · directional, from founder operating experience.
Built at AI speed. Shipped at QA speed.
AI tripled development velocity and never touched verification — so the bottleneck exploded from 2.6× to 6.5×, and the store gate now matters more than ever.
$25B and growing.
Aucert sits where mobile testing, app-security testing, and the new AI-native testing wave converge — each a multi-billion market growing double digits. Why we sum adjacent markets, not the whole ~$50B QA market.
total category
mobile-shipping buyers
5-yr obtainable
The bottom-up path to $1B+.
We don't script tests. We understand your product.
Traditional QA scripts every workflow by hand — then rewrites them on every change. We invert it: learn the product, capture your expectations, and generate the tests. Three innovations make that compound.
We understand your product — and never stop learning.
The failures that matter hide in the long tail — not the happy path everyone tests. Only a deep, ever-evolving model reaches them.
Your product's expectations — encoded once, enforced for all.
"Never leak PII," store rules, new vulnerabilities — ~70% is shared across apps, covered day one. Learn once, deploy to every customer: a real network effect.
The governance layer QA never had.
Define an expectation once; enforce it across every product and workflow. Bugs caught at the spec — shift-left by construction.
"No sensitive data in any screenshot."
One validation system. Four pillars that compound.
Same use-case layer on top. Underneath: Intelligence, Tests, Policies, Execution — wired as one system. Every pillar feeds the next, and every pillar gets sharper with each run.
- Rover
- App Analyzer
- Run learnings
- GitHub
- Notion
- Slack
- GDocs
- Firebase
- Apple Review
- Google Play
- Cross-customer
- Aucert Fintech
- Aucert Ecommerce
- Corp rules
- PII rules
- Brand · fintech
Product Intelligence
Unified intelligence layer — app screens, components and workflows.
Tests
Generated from Intelligence × Policies — curated baseline + per-customer customizations.
Policies
Rule library — shared baseline + proprietary corp policies, both enforced.
Execution
80 / 15 / 5 model cascade + device farm runs the test set. Every run sharpens both Intelligence and Policies — the loop closes here.
Validation starts at the spec — not after the build.
We hook into every step from Discuss to Ship — the live feedback loop for agentic development.
Define an expectation once. Enforced on every screen.
Apps fork into thousands of flows — we learn the product, not the scripts. "No sensitive data in screenshots" holds on login, checkout and KYC alike.
70–80% of your rulebook, day one.
Stop rebuilding the same expectations — a shared library ships the baseline and evolves with Apple, Google, fintech and commerce.
Two paradigm shifts in the last six months.
-
AI writes the majority of new codeQ2 2026Up from 41% a year ago · mobile no exception · human QA capacity unchanged>50% AI-gen
-
Mobile codegen explodedNov 2025 →Rork raised $15M · Replit Mobile · Cursor Mobile — all ship unvalidated APKs85% MoM
-
App stores cracked downNov 13 2025Apple 5.1.2(i) AI disclosure now live · Apple + Google combined: 3.7M blocks~3.7M rejected
-
AI now grasps intentApr 2026Reads screens, flows, and specs — then writes and maintains the test suite on its own.Self-maintaining
-
AI debugs failures on its ownQ1 2026Reasons about each failure, designs unique repro steps, returns a verified bug — not a flaky log.Autonomous triage
-
Frontier reasoning at SaaS-tier costQ2 2026Open-weight models + low-cost APIs + cascade to frontier when it matters.Cascade routing
"Impossible six months ago. Inevitable six months from now."
Three moats. All compound.
Policy Library
10K+ store, corp & regulatory policies, kept current — a regression caught in one app inoculates the rest. Why the shared library compounds across customers.
Product Intelligence
A living model of your product — deeper every run, catching edge cases no script reaches. Why leaving means starting from zero.
Verification Cascade
Most scans never touch a frontier model — the cascade keeps inference structurally cheap, with software-grade margins. Why a naive all-Opus wrapper can't compete.
Maker can't be checker
A model can't credibly grade its own output — Cursor, Copilot, Apple and Google all generate; none can independently validate. We sit in the seat both sides accept. An edge for independent validation — and we're built for it.
Where we sit. Mobile validation, not mobile testing infrastructure.
A 2×2 of mobile-test players on two axes — scripted→agentic and point solution→validation platform. We're alone in the top-right — and most of the field sells infrastructure, not a verdict.
View detailed comparison table (11 players)
| Player | What they sell | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|
| BrowserStack $4B · $381M ARR | Cross-browser + real-device cloud | Infrastructure, not a release signal. You still write the tests. No compliance intelligence. |
| Sauce Labs $1B+ raised | Selenium / Appium cloud | Same — IaaS. Built pre-AI. Manual test authoring required. |
| HeadSpin $124M raised | Global real-device mobile + web testing | Device-farm depth without the verdict layer. No store-rule library, no AI-codegen-specific posture. Sells minutes, not pass/fail. |
| Kobiton $46M raised · Atlanta | Mobile-only device cloud + AI scripting | Mobile-first device farm + self-healing Appium scripts. Still scripts-first; no store-policy intelligence; no cross-customer intelligence. |
| Perfecto Perforce-owned | Enterprise mobile-first test orchestration | Legacy enterprise stack — heavy, slow, pre-AI codegen. Bought into Perforce; no AI-native cascade, no OSS surface for developer pull. |
| Maestro mobile.dev · OSS | YAML-flow mobile UI testing (Appium replacement) | Closest in spirit (mobile-only, OSS-first) — but a test-authoring framework, not a verdict service. Customers run Maestro plus Aucert. |
| mabl $77M raised · Vista, CRV, GV | Low-code AI test automation | Web-first; you still author flows. Self-healing tests ≠ compliance signal. No cross-store rule pack. |
| Applitools $57M raised · Battery, Sierra | Visual AI regression testing | Single layer (visual) of the five we cover. Plugs in alongside us — validates the AI-testing category, not a competitor. |
| QA Wolf ~$57M raised · Series B | AI + managed E2E test coverage (web + mobile) | Coverage-as-a-service — their AI + QA engineers build & maintain your tests. Web-first; output is CI pass/fail, not a store-submission verdict. No compliance / security layer. |
| Mobileboost GPT Driver · YC · from $799/mo | AI-vision mobile test authoring (natural-language steps) | Closest "agentic" authoring — but runs inside XCUITest / Espresso / Appium. "Release gating" = CI pass/fail; no security, compliance, or cross-store certification. |
| Firebase Test Lab Google | Free Robo crawler + device access | Android only. No compliance. No fix prompts. No incentive to block submissions to its own store. |
| Aucert | A release signal + fix prompt | Independent · cross-store · cross-customer learning · 6-surface embed · OSS install base. |
Pre-launch. Five design partners in motion. Launch August 2026.
- Working CLI: aucert validate
- LLM cascade — Haiku → Sonnet → Opus, end-to-end
- Rule pack: 5.1.2(i), iOS 17/18, top-20 Play flags
- 3 named · enterprise + mid-market
- 2 stealth · fintech & mobile commerce
- All five in active product feedback loops
- Cloud device farm — top 20 Android + iOS
- AI behavioral testing layer
- GitHub Action · OSS CLI · Web dashboard
The right pre-seed signal: validated pull before a dollar of GTM spend — five teams leaning in pre-launch, led by a founder relationship at PhonePe. We're raising to convert this demand, not to discover it.
USE OF FUNDS
QA / TESTING COMPARABLES
Mobile testing alone is tens of billions in aggregate value. We're playing in a proven category — with an AI-native wedge, a regulated gate, and a network that compounds.
invest@aucert.ai · Vivek Soneja & Rajesh Kumar
post-AI
Built at AI speed. Shipped at QA speed.
AI collapsed development time. Verification capacity never moved — features pile up in queue or leak to users.
- Launch August 2026
- 5 design partners in motion
- PhonePe verbal commit
One place to govern every expectation.
Three engines, one system — Product Intelligence, a compounding Policy Library, and Validation Governance. Set an expectation once; enforced across every product.
Slide 05 THE MOATall compound
Three moats that compound.
Product Intelligence · Policy Library · Verification Cascade — each deepening with every release.
Slide 07 THE TEAMWe've lived this problem — we owned the mobile release pipeline through every store-review cycle Aucert now automates.
Validation, not testing.
A decision, not a test tool — judged against expectations and policy, with the product depth to know the difference. Autonomous, and always re-checking as policies, threats, and releases change.
Slide 07